USAWeeklyNewsAug09Hist2


In the Shadow of Stern:
The Inside Story of a LEHI
 Intelligence Officer

loading . . . .

B’tzedek Volume 1, Number 2
Summer/Fall 1997/ 5757
by Arno Hakohen Weinstein

DURING THE early days of Israel's formation as an independent nation, there were those who saw the Jewish quest of two thousand years as a diplomatic struggle, and there were those for whom it meant war.

It may be that history has yet to judge the more critical of the two, for each position developed followers that continue to struggle with each other, as they did from the earliest years of the Zionist mission.

Those elements within the nascent Jewish State that relied on the violent removal of foreign powers from Mandate Palestine included the Fighters for Freedom of Israel (LEHI). The organization was founded by Avraham Stern and sought the liberation of Eretz Israeland the establishment of an autonomous Jewish polity.

This is the story of one intelligence officer of the LEHI. His name is Stanley Goldfoot. South African by birth, Mr. Goldfoot today resides in Jerusalem, and remains ever vigilant of Israel's future. The editors of B’tzedek were granted an interview with Mr. Goldfoot in an attempt to better understand one of the more dramatic events in the history of the LEHI and the nation of Israel. That event was the execution of United Nations' mediator Count Folke Bernadotte in the fall of 1948...

To read the entire "glorious" confession of how Bernadotte was assassinated, just go to the Zionist site that honors Goldfoot's crime:

http://www.saveisrael.com/articles/interestshadow.htm



To see how Jerry Falwell also honors this terrorist and assassin, read the selection below and then the entire article by Grace Halsell, an American journalist and former White House speech writer during the Johnson administration.

Christian Fundamentalist And Jewish Orthodox Cults Plot Destruction Of Al Aqsa Mosque

For three decades, Gershon Solomon, a militant Israeli who heads an organization dedicated to the destruction of Jerusalem's most holy Islamic shrine, has led Zionist zealots in armed assaults on the Muslim grounds of Haram al-Sharif, or Noble Sanctuary, that encloses both the Dome of the Rock and Al Aqsa mosque. No Israeli political leader has spoken out against the assaults on the Mosque, holy to a billion Muslims around the world. Moreover, no Israeli rabbi has condemned them. Indeed, beginning in 1967, many of the assaults were led by Jewish rabbis.


I first heard about the Israeli militants' intent to destroy the mosque in 1979 when I went to Jerusalem. I talked at length with Bobby Brown, a third-generation American from Brooklyn, flying to the Jewish state and instantly became a new citizen, confiscated land from Palestinians to help build an illegal Jewish settlement. "The mosque," he told me, "has got to go. It is a blot in our land."


Militant Jews such as Brown and Solomon want a Jerusalem that is pure Jewish - without evidence of inhabitants of the other monotheistic faiths and their shrines. Surprisingly, millions of U.S. evangelical Christians endorse and financially support this Jewish plan. Although united in the immediate goal of destroying the mosque, the Israeli militants and Christian zealots have different long-range agendas.

Secular Jews, such as Stanley Goldfoot, one of the perpetrators of the dynamiting in 1946 of the King David Hotel which killed some 100 Christian, Muslim and Jewish civilians, want the mosque destroyed for political reasons. Other Jews believe that the building of the temple on the Muslim grounds will usher in the Jewish Messiah. A growing number of Christians embrace the idea that in all history, Israel is on the center stage. They say God has planned epochs of time ("dispensations") such as the "in-gathering of the Jews in the ancient land of Canaan. One epoch, they say, includes the present time when Jews are obligated to build a Jewish temple and re-institute animal sacrifice, Such epochs or "dispensations" are necessary, they say before Christ can return.

Ironically, while Christian dispensationalists place Israel as the most important nation in all the world, they do not respect or even like Jews- as Jews. Yet, because they believe Christ can only land in a "safe" area near Jerusalem, they make a cult of the land. They thus give total, unquestioned support to Israel.  
 

Goldfoot and Solomon are welcome in countless U.S. pulpits, where Christian Zionists give generous donations of money, as well as their gold wedding rings and gold earrings to finance the mosque's destruction. They know its destruction might well trigger wars culminating in Armageddon, but they welcome this. They push Armageddon along, saying they, as "Born Again Christians," will be spared any suffering, because they will be "Raptured," wafted up into heaven to view the slaughter below.
 

"I am not worried," Lynchburg, Virginia televangelist Jerry Falwell shouts. "You know why? I ain't gonna be here!" This dispensationalist doctrine, less then 200 years old, pervades Assemblies Of God, Pentecostal and other charismatic churches, as well as the 16 million-member Southern Baptist Convention and countless so-called Bible churches and mega-churches.


It's estimated that at least one out of every 10 Americans is a devotee of this cult. In both Israel and the U.S., a conspiracy of silence reigns as militants lay siege to the Jerusalem mosque. No political leader - or religious leader- in Israel or the U.S. has addressed this issue. In the case of Israeli rabbis, if they themselves have not aided and abetted planned assaults on the mosque, they have kept silent. In the case of all major U.S. Christian church leaders - the voices that are heard throughout the land- if they themselves are not raising money to destroy the mosque, they keep silent about the conspiracy... 

http://www.aqsa.org.uk/flyers/plots.html


Available at Amazon.com
and on order from many
bookstores.  Read this!

Forcing God's Hand:
Why Millions Pray for a Quick Rapture--
And Destruction of Planet Earth


Does God want--even demand--that those of us living today destroy Planet Earth?

Jim Jones led his followers to death telling them the end is near, so let's get on with it. Today, most TV evangelists say the same. David Koresh of the "Branch Davidians" and leaders of "Heaven's Gate" led followers to death declaring the world was doomed to imminent destruction.

The danger to America, however, lies not so much in the so-called "crazies" as with mainstream Christians who have embraced a theology less than 200 years old. It gives them a free Rapture ticket. While they are certain there will be a great Tribulation--of wars ending in a final war--they are brainwashed to believe they won't suffer a moment of agony. As Jerry Falwell puts it, "I'm not worried. You know why? I ain't gonna be here."

These cult members look like your average next-door neighbors. They attend a variety of Protestant churches, including those known as charismatic. They are rife among the 16-million-member Southern Baptist Convention. They also are members of so-called Bible churches and mega-churches, such as those attended by Special Prosecutor Kenneth Starr in McLean, Virginia, and Congressman Tom DeLay in Sugarland, a suburb of Houston.

One of every ten Americans is a member of this cult. By praying for their Rapture and the End of Time, might they force the hand of God--to bring it about?

Forcing God's Hand was Grace Halsell's last book. Her death occurred in 2000, less than a year after its publication and shortly before now Israel Prime Minister Sharon intently provokes a crisis and new "Intifada" by going to the "Temple Mount" with soldiers.

We will soon have a Memorial page
for humanitarian Grace Halsell
at this website with many 
photos and articles.

1923-2000

http://members.aol.com/GraceHalsell
Click here above for her own 
renewed Home Page.



 

Not all Zionist warriors had quite so vast a conquest in mind as Egypt to Iraq. This is the "map" the Irgun, headed by later Prime Minister Menachem Begin, saw as representing the territory they were to seize from the Arab inhabitants. Begin took part in "terror" activities such as the bombing of the King David Hotel and massacres of Arab villagers.  Albert Einstein and other Jews who opposed viciousness condemned the behavior of Begin and others like him.  Christian Fundamentalist preacher Jerry Falwell also became a great buddy to Begin and continues to promote other Zionists today who call for "ethnic cleansing" of the West Bank which Falwell refers to as Judea and Samaria.

  
Greater Israel
(the lesser views)

Rak Kach

Emblem of the Irgun which shows all of Palestine 
and Transjordan as the conquest goal in the late 1940s.

This is the Israeli coin that some Arabs seem to see
having the image of a map of the grander
"Greater Israel," although, if it is a map at all, it would appear
to be more like the Irgun emblem.

See below an account of how an American discovered that Palestinians in Gaza do believe in Israeli intentions to conquer from the Nile to the Euphrates. Why would these oppressed people not suspect Zionist plots that might appear to us as "paranoid" unless we realize the very real fears behind them?  Are these Palestinians crazy, or do they know the long history of Zionist schemes which rarely is revealed in our U.S. media?

Selection From

An American in Gaza

See link below to read the entire report
 and see many photos
 of Palestinians as human beings
 and not faceless enemy terrorists.

I'm not sure what conclusions to draw from these experiences. Life is very bad here. It seems that the daily hardship and humiliation these people suffer at the hands of the Israelis can only lead to hopelessness. And people with nothing to lose are much more likely to take drastic measures than people who feel secure. I have met many people here who condemn the operations against Israel. Everyone I've met here says they want peace, that all they want is the right to live freely in their own land, that 60 years ago Jews, Christians, and Muslims all lived here together peacefully. Everyone I've met has told me that they believe this land is for all the people of the world to share. People here ask me what else they can do when everything they have tried has failed. I don't know what to tell them. The situation seems hopeless.

The ten agorot coin is the smallest value coin in circulation in Palestine and Israel. When I first saw this coin, before anyone told me what it was, I thought the image engraved on the back was a map with a menorah superimposed over it. Many Palestinians believe that this image is a map of the biblical land of Israel, a map of all the land from the Euphrates to the Nile, two-thirds of Iraq, all of Jordan, most of Lebanon, all of the Sinai Peninsula, and of course all of the West Bank and Gaza. Every Palestinian I have asked about the image has told me this.Yasser Arafat always used to carry these coins with him as evidence of Israel's expansion plans. The designer of the coin claims that this is not a map at all, that it is simply the outline of an ancient Judean coin, the smooth edges of which had worn away centuries ago. Any resemblance to a map, we are told, is purely coincidental. Even if the designer did not intend for this image to be interpreted as a map, it seems strange to me that no one bothered to see if Palestinians would find the image on the coin offensive before putting it into circulation. But it's not so strange really. Even if this coin isn't proof of Zionist expansion plans, it is definitely evidence of the State of Israel's insensitivity to the needs of Palestinians. Only a year ago the five agorot coin was taken out of circulation because the Israeli currency is declining so rapidly. Two years ago, the New Israeli Sheqel was worth about 33 cents. Today, it is worth just a little over 20 cents, a decline of over 30%. There are 100 Agorot in a sheqel. So this coin that has generated so much controversy is worth only about two cents today. About the only thing it can buy is a small piece of candy for a child. In fact, children are the only people I have ever seen spending one of these coins. When I arrived here a month ago, the exchange rate was 4.7 sheqels to the US Dollar. Now it is 4.9. Soon the ten agorot coin will be as worthless as its predecessors and will be taken out of circulation as well. If only the ideas it represents to so many people would lose currency as easily.

http://www.morelater.com/report/report.htm

 

Below is map of (the pink areas) where current extremist Zionists are telling Jews worldwide to come to live even if it means driving all Arabs out.  This area actually goes well beyond present Palestinian territory (the West Bank and Gaza) into a wider intended Israel that includes areas already returned in peace accords like the Sinai to Egypt after the 1967 war.  Recruiting new Jewish immigrants worldwide to resettle some of these areas would mean a new war to reoccupy them.

QUOTE FROM ZIONIST SITE:
You need this land and it needs you, many of you.
 Millions of new Jews pouring into Israel will fill up its empty spaces, 
guarantee the retention of all the liberated lands of 
Judea, Samaria, Golan, Gaza, and Sinai;
 assure a vast Jewish majority; add Western democratic
 and technical skills to the land.
 Eretz Yisrael will never again be lost to us!
(from the ahavat-israel.com site --
 appeal for Jews to come to settle areas above)
NOTE: The Sinai would have to be reoccupied to do this.

This image of the grander "Greater Israel" is the only one presently on a Zionist site in English. The implication is that this may happen not necessary as a political or military objective but perhaps after the Jewish "Messiah." The map, however, is very clear that these Zionists see  themselves as eventual rulers of most Arab lands.


Greater Israel Map In Hebrew

Does this image make it clear enough
 that what the Arabs and other Muslims have claimed,
 about schemes for Israeli expansionism, is actually
 a valid concern and not baseless craziness?


These other "Greater Israel" images are at anti-Zionist sites
that make the accusation of Israeli conquest plans.

Israel's Grand Design:
 Leaders Crave Area from Egypt to Iraq

by John Mitchell Henshaw

NOTE: The late John Henshaw was chief legman for columnist Drew Pearson, who later broke with Pearson. At that time, Henshaw’s expenses were paid by the Anti-Defamation League, a lobby for Israel, which had a "special relationship" with Pearson. Thus Henshaw’s Middle East insights are unique.

A Historical Perspective from 1968
http://www.mediamonitors.net/johnhenshaw1.html

Israel Plans Britzkrieg to Capture Arab Oil Fields
Operation Shekhinah -- February 2002 
by Joe Vialls

If there is any validity to Mr. Vialls claim -- it would appear that ultra-Zionist sympathizers in Bush's administration have now seen to it that American men and women military persons will be the ones to fight and die for Israel's need for oil and expansion plans into Greater Israel.

http://geocities.com/operationshekhinah2/two.html



Greater Israel
(the grander view)


The Israel of Theodore Herzl (1904)
and of Rabbi Fischmann (1947)

In his Complete Diaries, Vol. II. p. 711, Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that the area of the Jewish State stretches: "From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates." 

Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony to the U.N. Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July 1947: "The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon."

NOTE: Sometimes the term Nile to the Euphrates is used, whereas the Brook of Egypt may be another lesser waterway about 100 miles East of the Nile.  Either way, it adds up to the confiscation of a huge amount of Arab territory.


Selections from

The Zionist Plan for the Middle East

Translated and edited by
Israel Shahak

(Concentration camp survivor and anti-Zionist Jew)


In 1982 Shahak wrote the following commentary on the Israeli policy text he translated into English.  Note that the main schemer then was Ariel Sharon whose invasion of Lebanon was part of this plan for division and conquest of the entire Arab world.  Sharon is now again in power but has used American Zionist sympathizers like Perle and Wolfowitz to have the U.S. military carry out his scheme for the ultimate establishment of Greater Israel. 

These men are not reprehensible because they happen to be Jews.  Many American Jews oppose both the war against Iraq and Israel's cruel occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.  These men may be guilty of questionable loyalties that appear to place the interests of Israel above the security of the United States.  It is not their religious or ethnic group that is being questioned.  It is their political and military influence upon Bush apparently due to a fanatical commitment to Zionism that is at issue.


The following essay represents, in my opinion, the accurate and detailed plan of the present Zionist regime (of Sharon and Eitan) for the Middle East which is based on the division of the whole area into small states, and the dissolution of all the existing Arab states. I will comment on the military aspect of this plan in a concluding note. Here I want to draw the attention of the readers to several important points:

1. The idea that all the Arab states should be broken down, by Israel, into small units, occurs again and again in Israeli strategic thinking. For example, Ze'ev Schiff, the military correspondent of Ha'aretz (and probably the most knowledgeable in Israel, on this topic) writes about the "best" that can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq: "The dissolution of Iraq into a Shi'ite state, a Sunni state and the separation of the Kurdish part" (Ha'aretz 6/2/1982). Actually, this aspect of the plan is very old.

2. The strong connection with Neo-Conservative thought in the USA is very prominent, especially in the author's notes. But, while lip service is paid to the idea of the "defense of the West" from Soviet power, the real aim of the author, and of the present Israeli establishment is clear: To make an Imperial Israel into a world power. In other words, the aim of Sharon is to deceive the Americans after he has deceived all the rest
.

http://www.theunjustmedia.com/the%20zionist_plan_for_the_middle_east.htm


NOTE: American Neo-Conservatives run the American Enterprise Institute where President George Bush gave his February 26, 2003 "War on Iraq" speech with all its lying nonsense about how the goal is liberation of the Iraqi people and democracy in the Middle East.  He clearly stated how proud he is that 20 members of this Zionist dominated "think tank" are part of his administration's top planners.  


Graphic QUOTE from guess what?

The American Enterprise Institute Magazine

(more on this topic soon -- sign up on our Home Page
 for E-mail notification of updates and additions)

 


Zionists who practiced brutal conquest --
See their photos and confessions next.

Here is an example of an ultra-Zionist who preached and practiced this doctrine that King Saud opposed.  Just in case we think such ideas are no longer honored by extremists in Israel, this biography is from a Zionist website that honors Avraham Stern -- a well-known killer whose "Stern Gang" perpetrated massacres and assassinations during the period leading up to the creation of the State of Israel.  Many Arab leaders knew exactly what plans for bloody conquest of their own homelands Zionist fanatics like this intended.

The new coalition government that Sharon recently established contains many open advocates of the "ethnic cleansing" (so-called transfer) of all Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza.  What would the world say if Bush made a coalition government in the U.S. with the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazis who would fiercely advocate the deportation of all non-whites from American soil? The ultra-Zionists in the Israeli government right now consider these racist murderers below to be heros.

Also, the settlements Sharon originally encouraged many years ago and Sharansky has more recently promoted are mostly populated by vicious fanatics who believe in the Greater Israel scheme and are prepared to annihilate Palestinians and other Arabs to bring it about.  These too are their great heros.


AVRAHAM (YAIR) STERN:

THE IDEOLOGY OF THE LEHI

National Revival Principles (HaTechiya)
The Fighters for the Freedom of Israel (FFI)  - The LEHI
by Avraham (Yair) Stern, zt"l

1. THE NATION
The Jewish people is a covenanted people, the originator of monotheism, formulator of the prophetic teachings, standard bearer of human culture, guardian of glorious patrimony. The Jewish people is schooled in self-sacrifice and suffering; its vision, survivability and faith in redemption are indestructible.Stern

2. THE HOMELAND
The homeland in the Land of Israel within the borders delineated in the Bible ("To your descendants, I shall give this land, from the River of Egypt to the great Euphrates River." Genesis 15:18) This is the land of the living, where the entire nation shall live in safety.

3. THE NATION AND ITS LAND
Israel conquered the land with the sword. There it became a great nation and only there it will be reborn. Hence Israel alone has a right to that land. This is am absolute right. It has never expired and never will.

4. THE GOALS
1. Redemption of the land.
2. Establishment of sovereignty.
3. Revival of the nation.
There is no sovereignty without the redemption of the land, and there is no national revival without sovereignty.

These are the goals of the organization during the period of war and conquest:


5. EDUCATION
Educate the nation to love freedom and zealously guard Israel's eternal patrimony. Inculcate the idea that the nation is master to its own fate. Revive the doctrine that "The sword and the book came bound together from heaven" (Midrash Vayikra Rabba 35:8)

6. UNITY
The unification of the entire nation around the banner of the Hebrew freedom movement. The use of the genius, status and resources of individuals and the channeling of the energy, devotion and revolutionary fervor of the masses for the war of liberation.

7. PACTS
Make pacts with all those who are willing to help the struggle of the organization and provide direct support.

8. FORCE
Consolidate and increase the fighting force in the homeland and in the Diaspora, in the underground and in the barracks, to become the Hebrew army of liberation with its flag, arms, and commanders.

9. WAR
Constant war against those who stand in the way of fulfilling the goals.

10. CONQUEST
The conquest of the homeland from foreign rule and its eternal possession.

These are the tasks of the movement during the period of sovereignty and redemption:


11. SOVEREIGNTY
Renewal of Hebrew sovereignty over the redeemed land.

12. RULE OF JUSTICE
The establishment of a social order in the spirit of Jewish morality and prophetic justice. Under such an order no one will go hungry or unemployed. All will live in harmony, mutual respect and friendship as an example to the world.

13. REVIVING THE WILDERNESS
Build the ruins and revive the wilderness for mass immigration and population increase.

14. ALIENS
Solve the problem of alien population by exchange of population.

15. INGATHERING OF THE EXILES
Total in-gathering of the exiles to their sovereign state.

16. POWER
The Hebrew nation shall become a first-rate military, political, cultural and economical entity in the Middle East and around the Mediterranean Sea.

17. REVIVAL
The revival of the Hebrew language as a spoken language by the entire nation, the renewal of the historical and spiritual might of Israel. The purification of the national character in the fire of revival.

18. THE TEMPLE
The building of the Third Temple as a symbol of the new era of total redemption.


UNKNOWN SOLDIERS
Anthem of the Fighters for the Freedom of Israel (LEHI)
by Yair (Avraham) Stern, zt"l

We are unknown soldiers, uniforms we have none,
In death's shadow we march, in its terror,
Volunteering to sever to the end of our days,
Only death from our duty can us sever.
In days red with slaughter, destruction and blood,
Nights black with pain and despair,
Over village and town our flag we'll unfurl,
Love and freedom the message 'twill bear.
Not like slaves brought to heel were we dragged to the fight,
In strange lands our life's blood to squander,
And if we must die our people to free,
We are willing our lives to surrender.
In days red with slaughter...
With obstacles rising to block every move,
By fate cruelly sent to entrap us,
Neither enemy, prison or miserable spy
Will we ever permit to divert us.
In days red with slaughter...
Should we happen to fall in some building or street,
To be furtively buried by night,
Many thousands of others will rise in our stead
To defend and continue the fight.
In days red with slaughter...
With the tears of mothers bereaved of their young,
Sacred infant's blood want only spilt,
We'll cement the bricks of our bodies for walls
And our homeland will surely be built
In days red with slaughter, destruction and blood,
Nights black with pain and despair,
Over village and town our flag we'll unfurl
Love and freedom the message 'twill bear.

Do these Zionist fanatics sound any less fanatical than Bin Laden?
Is it only a "crazy Arab" notion that some Zionists then and now 
have intended to eventually conquer most of the Muslim world?


loading image . . . .
Uri Zvi Greenberg sits on the Temple Mount with liberating Israeli soldiers

One Truth and Not Two
by Uri Zvi Greenberg
(interpreted from Hebrew by Laurence Cramer)

Your Rabbis taught: A land is bought with money
You buy the land and work it with a hoe.

And I say: A land is not bought with money
And with a hoe you also dig and bury the dead.
And I say: A land is conquered with blood.
And only when conquered with blood is hallowed to the people
With the holiness of the blood.
And only one who follows after the cannon in the field,
Thus wins the right to follow after his good plow
On this, the field that was conquered.
And only such a field gives nourishing and healthy bread
And the house which arises on its hill is truly a fortress and a temple,
Because in this field there is honorable blood.

Your Rabbis taught: The messiah will come in future generations:
And Judea will arise without fire and without blood.
It will arise with every tree, with every additional house.

And I say: If your generation will be slow
And will not grasp in its hands and forcibly mold its future
And in fire will not come with the Shield of David
And in blood will not come with its horses saddled -
The Messiah will not come even in a far off generation.
Judea will not arise.
And you will be living slaves to every foreign ruler.
Your houses will be straw for the sparks of every wicked one.
And your trees will be cut down with their ripe fruit.
And a man will react the same as a babe
To the sword of the enemy -
And only your ramblings will remain - yours...
And your statue, an eternal curse.
Your Rabbis taught: There is one truth for the nations:
Blood for blood - but it is not a truth for Jews.
And I say: There is one truth and not two.

As there is one sun and as there are not two Jerusalems.
It was written in the Law of Conquest of Moses and Joshua
Until the last of my kings and my traitors have consumed.

And there will be a day when from the river of Egypt until the Euphrates
And from the sea until the mountain passes of Moav my boys will go up
And they will call my enemies and my haters to the last battle.
And the blood will decide: 

Who is the only ruler here.

Here is some information about how Zionist extremists and their American Christian supporters are working together to create chaos and bloodshed and may thus be engaging in a self-fulfilling prophesy of a great Armageddon.  Consider President Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Ashcroft in on this dangerous and deluded scheme.  The American ultra-Zionists who are influencing them are Richard Perle, William Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz, Eliot Abrams, and others who appear to place their loyalty to Israel above the true interests of the United States.  Our men and women in the U.S. military are being sent to fight and die for Israel to be safe from Arab countries that are concerned about Israeli designs upon their own nation's soil.  In the process, many innocents on both sides of this conflict will perish needlessly.  This below is the mentality behind our current events.  The Muslim claim of a Zionist-Christian "crusade" does not sound so absurd if we know the facts often unrevealed by our usual media.  

 





Is Guilty Of Punching Horse
Wednesday February 28, 
A jockey has been found guilty of punching his horse in the head in a temper tantrum after losing a race. Lodewijk De Smet, one of the world's leading equestrians, yanked hard on the reins and galloped towards horrified spectators and children after hitting the animal. The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons said De Smet - who is also a vet - was guilty of using unjustifiable force against his horse. It now has to decide whether the punch amounts to disgraceful conduct before making any (Advertisement) sanction. De Smet could be suspended or even struck off from his profession. The Austrian vet had been competing in a relay race with his wife for the Banwen Miners Hunt. But De Smet became angry after losing to a group of youngsters on the opposition team, the Celtic Blood Hounds. He began his tantrum as soon as he crossed the finish line. Diane James, the master of the rival team, told the hearing: "My view was that he was embarrassed to be beaten by a group of youngsters." The event's commentator and organiser Christine Chambers said she heard De Smet swear at least six times. Members of the panel had watched a video recording of the race in Brecon during the three-day hearing in central London. De Smet, of Ammanford, Camarthenshire, told the hearing he had never been criticised for his conduct and had never hit his horse. Biut he added that he was embarrassed and "very, very sorry" he had lost his temper
 

    Greater Israel -- What Does It Really Mean? 2003 - 2005 

Alfred Lilienthal


(NOTE: This web page is very long and filled with photos and maps.
Please be patient if it takes extra time for you to view fully.)


Greater Israel --
 What Does It Really Mean?

2003 - 2005

(NOTE: This web page was first created in early 2003 at the start of the US-led war on Iraq. A few additions have been made [and are marked as such] that provide new material in 2004 or refer to then 2003-present events as past. Please note that the material as it was first posted in 2003 clearly stated that other nations besides Iraq would soon be on the attack list as shown on our Uncle Sam poster next. And that this wider war instigated by the Neo-Conservatives in the Bush administration was primarily on behalf of the interests of Israel.)

The U.S. led war on Iraq... and eventually many other Muslim nations may be part of an Israeli plan to let others die for the goal of its expansion into Greater Israel. Extremist Zionist sympathizers in Bush's administration are the perpetrators of this scheme to have American military men and women die for Israel. See the arguments below for this claim. 


 Are Arabs and other Muslims really "crazy" 
 to believe  that the War on Iraq may be part of 
 an  Israeli and American "Zionist" plot to 
 dominate the entire Middle East? 

 


KING SAUD INTERVIEW BY LILIENTHAL

ON ARAB-AMERICAN RELATIONS

AND ZIONISM

The Federal Herald 
October 1954


From middle column of second page below:

Mr. Lilienthal: …Your Majesty a few months ago… said that the Arabs do not care if they sacrifice a few million persons in order to put an end to the Zionists in Palestine.

His Majesty then said: Frankly what I said is what I urge and preach. It is the only answer to what has been published by the responsible persons of Israel about the necessity that Israel should expand to comprise the beds of the Tigris and Euphrates, the Sinai Peninsula and the northern part of Saudi Arabia, including Medina, which is one of the two Holy Towns and the Burial place of the Moslems’ Prophet, and which is after all my own land and the land of every Arab and Moslem. We have learned of this Zionist ambition from the statements of Israeli leaders and its creators who pleaded the course yesterday, and are still pleading it today. They are making no secret of this scheme, and they have made its study part of the school curriculum in Israel, where they cram the students’ heads with these fanciful schemes. There is no answer to what they are after except this antidote, and the preparation of what we can in field of might and force.

To read this quote in context and the entire 1954 interview
click on each graphic below for a readable enlargement.

   Page 1 - start of entire interview                                  Page 2 - quote from middle column     


This 1954 quote from King Saud provides an important insight that Americans and other Westerners rarely hear about  as to why the Arabs, in the early days of Israel in the late 1940s and early 1950s, made fierce statements about the need for "driving the Jews back into the sea."
 

Fifty years later, another (very infamous) Arab professes the same view that Israel intends to rule all the territory from the Nile to the Euphrates.

Do Americans realize that many Arab-Muslims believe they are defending their own lands and existence -- and not just that of the Palestinian Arabs?

Would we see it as only mindless Bin Laden style "terror" --  if there was any basis for their claim to need to defend themselves against American and Israeli plans to conquer the entire Middle East and subdue all Muslims?

See News and Other Commentary Next

 


Fair Use Disclaimer
(for news & other items)

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107. "Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include -

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."

   

NOTE: To read this entire web page without leaving to view other outside resources we link to as confirmation, wait until the end of this entire page and then click to our  Greater Israel "LINKS"   page for all the ones below and many additional articles we recommend at several other websites. 

Also, we do not totally agree with everything in a specific outside article or with controversial material we do not directly link to on those same websites.  Our viewpoint is expressed here and is not always represented in outside sources.


Feb 16, 2003 8:26 AM EST

http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EGYPT_BIN_LADEN_TAPE?SITE=PAPIT&SECTION=HOME

'Bin Laden' Tape Claims Plot Vs. Muslims

By MAAMOUN YOUSSEF
Associated Press Writer

CAIRO, Egypt (AP) -- An audiotape purportedly from Osama bin Laden calls President Bush "stupid" and claims American war plans against Iraq are part of a plot to attack Muslim nations in the Middle East and North Africa.

The tape appeared to be the same 53-minute recording of which a few excerpts were released Thursday by the British-based Islamic Al-Ansaar news agency. It began appearing in full Sunday on Islamic-oriented Web sites. Al-Ansaar had said it acquired the tape from a seller who advertised it over the Internet.

The United States' goal in waging war against Iraq is to change the regional map to benefit Israel, according to the raspy voice said to belong to bin Laden.

"It is clear that the preparations to attack Iraq are part of a series of attacks prepared for nations of the region including Syria, Iran, Egypt and Sudan,"the voice said.

"The aim of the Crusaders' campaign is to prepare the atmosphere for the establishment of the so-called greater Israel state, which includes great parts of Iraq, Egypt, Syria, Jordan and large portions of (Saudi Arabia),"it said.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bin Laden exhorts Muslims to fight "enemy" U.S.

By Miral Fahmy

DUBAI, Feb 16 (Reuters) - An Islamist website broadcast an audio tape purported to be the voice of Osama bin Laden telling Muslims to fight against the "enemy" United States and saying holy war was the only way to win Muslim rights.

If authenticated, the recording broadcast by the Jihad Forum site would be the latest proof that bin Laden had escaped the 2001 U.S.-led military campaign to flush him and his al Qaeda operatives from Afghanistan.

The voice on the tape was very clear and sounded like previous audio and video recordings allegedly made by bin Laden.

"Regarding this Zionist Crusader war on the nation of Islam,it is the duty of Muslims to fight for the sake of God and to incite the faithful to fight the infidels," the speaker said.

U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge said there had been some speculation about a second tape swirling around within the intelligence community for the past couple of days.

"Obviously we haven't authenticated it. But again, the message is consistent. The values of the West are anathema to these people," he told the ABC "This Week" program.

"If you don't believe, you're an infidel, and they're going to do everything they can to undermine the United States as the primary target...," he said.

Jihad Forum said the new message was made on the occasion of the three-day Muslim Eid al-Adha feast, which this year coincided with the threat of a looming U.S. war on Iraq and heightened anti-American sentiment in many Arab countries.

"It is the utmost duty to fight the enemy that sabotages the world. The only way to deal a decisive blow in the conflict with the enemy is through killing and fighting," the recording said.

The Saudi-owned Al Hayat newspaper first published excerpts of the recording, which they said could be found on the Islamist "Jihad Forum" site hosted by the www.arabforum.net website.

It follows another tape broadcast last week by Qatar's al Jazeera television in which the Saudi-born militant called on Muslims to stage suicide attacks to prevent a U.S. war on Iraq.

Jazeera, which normally obtains bin Laden's tapes, aired the latest 53-minute tape retrieved from the Internet over a picture of bin Laden in camouflage with a rifle by his side.

Both recordings coincide with a state of high alert in the United States and its ally Britain. They said they had concrete information that al Qaeda was planning a slew of attacks.

Attacks have in the past followed messages by bin Laden, and recent tapes by him have heightened fears of an imminent strike.

WAR TO CREATE "GREATER ISRAEL"

Bin Laden said an attack on Iraq would be followed by U.S. "aggressions" against more Arab countries such as Egypt, Sudan, Iran and Syria for the benefit of its ally Israel.

"This attack on Iraq is part of a new crusade to prepare the region, after dividing it, for the creation of a Greater Israel. This means the whole region will be ruled by Jews,"he said.

The recording began with bin Laden identifying the United States and its "foolish" President George W. Bush as the enemy.

It said Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair wanted to carve up the Middle East like a 1916 British-French pact that divided up the territory of the Ottoman Empire.

"The United States' goal to divide the Middle East is not just a passing fancy," the al Qaeda leader said. "The only way to defeat the infidels is through Holy War.

"Oh Muslims, do not fear America because we have defeated them repeatedly and they are the most cowardly of people when you meet them face to face," he declared.

He lauded wars Muslims had fought and won against "Western Crusaders" throughout history and recounted the times militants -- some from his al Qaeda group -- had bombed U.S. and Western targets in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Somalia, Kenya and Tanzania.

He also praised the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington, which the United States accuses him of planning, saying they "exposed the ugly face of America and revealed the reality of the conflict between Crusaders and Muslims."

"At a time of great depression for Muslims, when the Zionist American alliance was killing our sons...a group of youth hijacked enemy planes in a beautiful, courageous attack.

"They destroyed the idols of America...They rubbed America's nose in the dirt and wiped its pride in the mud. They destroyed the Twin Towers of New York and with that the legend of America, the superpower."

Bin Laden lambasted America's Arab allies, singling out Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah for his peace initiative last year in which Arabs offered Israel full ties in return for withdrawal from Arab land occupied in the 1967 Middle East War.


02/16/03 12:06 ET

NOTE:
  This is the answer to the question everyone has been asking:
   WHY DO THEY HATE US? 

Bin Laden is wicked and wrong just as the deception and brutality of Ariel Sharon is inexcusable.  Both count as vicious terrorists.  Yet American leaders make Bin Laden's case look valid -- that the U.S. is out to fight for Israel's right to expand and rule the entire Middle East.  What is really going on behind the scenes?

Question: What did the assumed Bin Laden tape recordings accuse? Answer:  U.S. military attacks prompted by Israel against many Muslim nations. 

Here is an American official immediately proving the accusation to be correct!


U.S. official to Israel: 
We'll deal with Syria, Iran after Iraq war

(from an Israeli newspaper that often
 reveals more truth than US media)

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/263923.html


Monday, February 17, 2003 Adar1 15, 5763 Israel Time:  19:57  (GMT+2)

U.S. official to Israel:
 We'll deal with Syria, Iran after Iraq war

By Aluf Benn and Sharon Sadeh, Haaretz Correspondents, Haaretz Service and Agencies



U.S. Undersec'y of State John Bolton
Syria and Iran are next.
(Photo: AP)

U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton said in meetings with Israeli officials on Monday that he has no doubt America will attack Iraq, and that it will be necessary to deal with threats from Syria, Iran and North Korea afterwards. (maybe not that last part... about North Korea... any time soon)

Bolton, who is undersecretary for arms control and international security, is in Israel for meetings about preventing the spread of weapons of mass destruction.

In a meeting with Bolton on Monday, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said that Israel is concerned about the security threat posed by Iran. It's important to deal with Iran even while American attention is turned toward Iraq, Sharon said.

Bolton also met with Foreign Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Housing and Construction Minister Natan Sharansky.

NOTE:  Netanyahu and Sharansky along with Sharon are all well known for their avowal of the right of settlement and eventual claim to the West Bank and Gaza as part of Greater Israel -- although Sharon is currently lying that he is willing to enter into a peace process again after Iraq and other Arab nations are vanquished by the U.S. military.  Is Bush such a fool, or does he know he is cooperating with these criminals? 


 

The man behind the Bush Zionists in U.S. --
 Sharansky in Israel 
(who tells Cheney and Wolfowitz what to tell Bush to say)

Date:  Fri Jul 5, 2002  10:53 am
Subject:  Coincidence? Parts of Bush speech match Sharansky proposal

Washington Post
July 2, 2002
A Sound Bite So Good, the President Wishes He Had Said It
By Dana Milbank

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A11253-2002Jul1.html

[excerpt of article follows]

Is Natan Sharansky working in the White House speechwriting office?

Sharansky, Israel's housing minister and deputy prime minister, is the former Soviet dissident and head of a right-wing Russian-immigrant party.  But by coincidence -- or something more -- the Israeli-Palestinian peace plan Sharansky published in the Jerusalem Post on May 3 sounds a lot like the peace proposal Bush delivered in the Rose Garden on June 24.

"The time has come for new leadership" for the Palestinians, Sharansky wrote. "The Palestinians must be encouraged to form an open and free society that is not burdened by the fear, hatred, and terror that have been sown in recent years by Arafat and his leadership."

Here's Bush's version: "Peace requires a new and different Palestinian leadership so that a Palestinian state can be born. I call on the Palestinian people to elect new leaders, leaders not compromised by terror."

Sharansky wrote that his seven-point plan "cannot happen overnight" and called for a "three-year transition period."

Bush, in turn, said a final agreement "could be reached within three years from now."

Sharansky envisioned an "international coordinating body" headed by the United States that could, with a Palestinian Administrative Authority, "develop the infrastructure for democratic life among the Palestinians." There would also be an "international economic fund" for industry and infrastructure.

And Bush? "I've asked Secretary Powell to work intensively with Middle Eastern and international leaders to realize the vision of a Palestinian state, focusing them on a comprehensive plan to support Palestinian reform and institution building." The president said the United States would work with the World Bank and international donors on "a major project of economic reform and development."

Finally, Sharansky argued that only a "free and open" society "can serve as a solid guarantee for normal relations between the two peoples." For this reason, "we owe it to ourselves and to our future to help the Palestinians help themselves."

Bush, seven weeks later, submitted that "a stable, peaceful Palestinian state is necessary to achieve the security that Israel longs for." Israel should "take concrete steps to support the emergence of a viable, credible Palestinian state," he added.

The Sharansky and Bush plans are not entirely the same; notably absent from Sharansky's version was Bush's call for Israel to freeze its settlements in Palestinian territory. Still, Sharansky themes began to tumble from the lips of Bush officials.

Speechwriting director Michael Gerson did not return a phone call asking about the coincidence.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The following article shows how Sharansky's influence came to Bush through Cheney, Perle, Wolfowitz, and other Zionist sympathizers (these can be either Christian fundamentalists or Jewish dual loyalists) in the Bush administration.  Sharansky speaks in public about "democracy" but actually is a leader of right-wing elements in Israel that believe in the ethnic superiority of Jews and eventual take-over of all Palestinian territory through expansion of Zionist settlements and eventual transfer out of all non-Jewish residents from the West Bank and Gaza.  

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  Mon Jul 8, 2002  9:22 am
Subject:  Sharansky discusses his role in Bush's speech

Newsweek
July 15, 2002
Sharansky’s Quiet Role
What pushed Bush to demand that Arafat must go? Part of the answer lies on a forest path in Colorado

By Dan Ephron and Tamara Lipper

Natan Sharansky, one time Soviet dissident and now an Israeli cabinet minister, had been hammering at the same themes for years in lectures and private meetings with U.S. officials: peace would never be possible without democracy. Suddenly something clicked at a conference of conservative heavyweights in Beaver Creek, Colo., last month.

VICE PRESIDENT DICK Cheney was there, taking notes. So was Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy Defense secretary. The two Americans had been working with others on a major Middle East policy speech for the president, and though they had both met Sharansky many times before, his address struck a chord. Dump the region’s dictators, and make democracy a precondition for peace. “It was pretty much the talk of the conference,” says Richard Perle, an influential Pentagon adviser who helped bring Sharansky to the forum. Two days later President George W. Bush announced the United States was fed up with the Palestinian leadership and effectively ended the era of American engagement with Arafat.

Score one for Sharansky and his crusade to alter the course of American diplomacy. Bush’s speech, possibly the most significant Middle East policy announcement by the United States in a decade, was hardly his doing alone. Arafat fatigue in the Bush administration had been on the rise at least since January, when U.S. officials believe the Palestinian leader lied to Bush about an arms shipment from Iran. Israeli intelligence kept up a steady stream of information linking Arafat to the financing of suicide attacks. By the time Cheney and other delegates arrived at the June 20 conference, Bush advisers had been working on the address for weeks and written nearly 30 drafts, according to one official. Sharansky may have strengthened the resolve of officials who argued against wording that would keep lines open to Arafat. The decision to drop the Palestinian leader was made shortly before Bush spoke out.“Sharansky provided an important bit of last-minute affirmation,” says Perle.

Palestinians object that Arafat is no dictator. He was elected in a 1996 ballot deemed free and fair by observers. And though his regime has jailed political opponents and trampled free speech, Israelis have hardly done better. Palestinians never had full civil rights during decades of Israeli rule.

Sharansky is hoping he had a hand in reshaping U.S. policy. At the conference, he says, he spoke privately with Cheney for more than an hour Saturday, two days before the Bush announcement. “More than half our talk was devoted to what would be said in the speech,” he says.Later Saturday, Sharansky andWolfowitz were due at a dinner reception, but as an observant Jew, Sharansky said he couldn’t drive on the Sabbath. Instead, he and Wolfowitz trudged through a forest on foot to get to the dinner, their bodyguards in tow. “It gave us a chance to talk about everything—Arafat, international terrorism, Iraq and Iran and, of course, Jewish history, our roots and so on,” Sharansky says.

That coziness reflects
a meeting of minds between Sharansky and Bush’s chief ideologues. Sharansky reads the Bush speech as a broader policy statement about dictators everywhere and says the United States should withdraw support not only for Arafat but for regimes like the one in Saudi Arabia. That might be going too far for Washington, where officials say Bush had mainly Palestinians and Israelis in mind.
But as far as the Israelis are concerned, it’s a big step in the right direction.


With Daniel Klaidman in Washington
http://www.msnbc.com/news/777064.asp


NOTE: Zionist leaders in the foreign state of Israel,
 in other words, can and do determine U.S. Foreign Policy.


Sharansky's motive is obviously not democracy for the Arab people. Read next about the deception behind Sharansky's influence on the "Bush doctrine" of using U.S. military force to "liberate" first Iraq and then force "progress" upon the several other Arab nations.  


Profile
Anatoly (Natan) Sharansky

from
http://www.redress.btinternet.co.uk/sharansky.htm


Israel's great dissembler
12 March 2001

We have chosen to profile Anatoly Sharansky, the Israeli deputy prime minister and leader of Yisra'el Ba'aliyah, the Russian immigrants' party in Israel, because he encapsulates the paradox of the Jewish inhabitants of Israel, a paradox that is the hallmark of Zionists throughout the world. That is, how can a people that has suffered so much over the ages, from pogroms in Europe to Nazi genocide, emulate their historical oppressors and be so lacking in empathy with their victims, the Palestinian Arabs?(We salute the tiny minority of Jews in Israel and elsewhere who have risked opprobrium by consistently speaking out for Palestinian rights.) Anatoly Sharansky (we shall call him by his birth name, Anatoly, rather than Natan, the name given to him by the Israeli ambassador to West Germany upon his release from prison) was born in Ukraine and educated in Russia as a mathematician. In 1973 he applied for an exit visa to Israel, but, like all Soviet citizens who had worked in the military-industrial complex, he was refused on security grounds. He then became involved in an Israeli-sponsored worldwide campaign to put pressure on the Kremlin to give special treatment to Soviet Jewish citizens by allowing them to emigrate to Israel, irrespective of whether or not they had worked in the defence sector. In 1977 he was arrested on suspicion of spying for the US, and in the following year he was found guilty as charged and sentenced to 13 years imprisonment. He was released in 1986 in a US-Soviet spy exchange. Prior to his emigration to Israel, Sharansky liked to portray himself as a symbol of the struggle for human rights, and since then he has made much of his status as a former "victim of totalitarian oppression". However, his belief in human rights, nurtured at the height of the Cold War, appears to have been heavily tainted with the culture of the Soviet-American power struggle, which justified the cynical use of practically anything as ammunition in the superpower rivalry for global dominance. Unlike most of us, Sharansky apparently does not believe that human rights are universal and indivisible, that is, applicable to all human beings everywhere and irrespective of their race, colour or creed. Not only does he oppose any Israeli concessions that may eventually lead to the realization of the Palestinians' right to self determination, but he advocates policies that could only mean the dispossession of more Palestinians living in Israel, and the illegally occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip. No wonder that he was one of the very few people to have amicable relations with the former ultra right-wing prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu. Sharansky began his political career in Israel by becoming head of the Zionist Forum, an organization dedicated to lobbying on behalf of Soviet immigrants. However, not content with being a mere "welfare worker", in 1995 he founded the Yisra'el Ba'aliyah party, with the immediate aim of bringing in another million Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union and of encouraging a further million Jewish citizens of the United States and the European countries to immigrate to Israel. For him, the value of peace with the Palestinians is measured solely by the extent to which it would work towards achieving the overriding goal of encouraging Jewish citizens of other states to immigrate to Israel. Thus, addressing the founding congress of Yisra'el Ba'aliyah in June 1995, he said: "Without the hope for peace, you cannot convince people to come here." That the "ingathering of the Jews", that is, the bringing into Israel and the occupied territories of millions of foreign Jews who, like Sharansky himself, had no link whatsoever to those lands, could only mean the dispossession of more Palestinians from the land of their ancestors is a fact that could hardly have escaped our human rights hero. Or perhaps, having been brought up in a society where ideology and the class struggle dictated one's view of life and where all conflicts were seen as a zero-sum game, with victors and vanquished, be they a class or a superpower, he was blinded by his own ideology, Zionism. For almost in the same breath as reiterating his commitment to the "ingathering" of millions of foreign Jews, Sharansky is perfectly at ease with publicly objecting to any hint of allowing Palestinians to take up residence in the territories administered by the Palestinian National Authority or to the right of refugees to return to those territories, even if they had families living there. Indeed, the impact of the Soviet system on Sharansky's mind appears to have gone much deeper. Thus, like the Soviet habit of remoulding the history books to suit themselves, our human rights hero insists that any Israeli withdrawal from the occupied territories should be made contingent on, among other things, the Palestinians rewriting their school books "to remove all language that denies the legitimacy of Israel and Zionism". In other words, Palestinian children should be taught that their uprooting from the land of their forefathers by foreigners from the former Soviet Union, Europe and the United States was perfectly legitimate. Sharansky resigned as Israeli interior minister in former Prime Minister Ehud Barak's government over rumours that Barak was contemplating some trivial "concessions" over Jerusalem, territory and the refugees at the Camp David talks with Palestinian leaders in July 2000. But, judging by the unpopularity among Israelis of making any concessions to the people they had uprooted, and given his solid support among the Russian immigrants, Sharansky must now have his vision firmly fixed on the position of Israeli prime minister. In the meantime, it would do him well to learn from the history of his Slav cousins in the Balkans. For while the Zionists have the dubious honour of being the twentieth century's first ethnic cleansers, Sharansky's kith and kin in the Balkans (let us not forget that our human rights hero is a Russian, albeit of the Jewish religion), have taken that tradition to its logical conclusion, with tragic consequences for themselves and their victims. His blind ambition aside, Sharansky has a responsibility to his compatriots and co-religionists in Israel because, as in the Balkans, the burden of history weighs heavily on the shoulders of the indigenous people of Palestine whose continuing misfortunes are unlikely to let them forget the architects of their plight. As a Russian, Sharansky should know more than anyone else that great powers, even nuclear ones, come and go and that the fall can be sudden and cruel. But, with his contradictions and double standards, our human rights hero is unlikely to learn anything. Rather, when the time comes to write his obituary Anatoly Sharansky will most probably be remembered as Israel's great Russian dissembler, with his years as a so-called "human rights campaigner" not warranting even a footnote.

NOTE:  This is the man behind the nonsense of Bush's promotion campaign for "democracy" in the Arab world.  Is it little wonder that "the Arab street" and some Arab leaders suspect that the real goal is the expansion of Greater Israel?





   International Clearing House
      NEWS YOU WON'T FIND ON CNN
           A ‘Greater’ US and a ‘Greater’ Israel

How great can you get and is the world big enough? William Bowles Wednesday, April 16, 2003 At first sight, an alliance between right-wing Christian fundamentalists and right-wing Zionist fundamentalists might appear too bizarre to be true. But not if their long-term aims coincide as they do with the Bush and Sharon governments. How the two strands of neo-imperialist thinking connect is instructive and helps explain a lot of the events of today. Oil and land, you gotta have one with the other Sharon’s ‘Greater Israel’ crusade represents the fascist side of Israeli colonialism, masquerading as a ‘defence’ of the ‘Jewish homeland’. And it has suited US imperialist ambitions since the founding of Israel in 1948, to go along with this vision because the creation of Israel acted as a block to Arab nationalism and of course, as long as the Arab nations remain divided, gives free access to the vast oil reserves so crucial to the US economy. Taking out Saddam is clearly the first step in US attempts to redraw the map of the Middle East and take care of the Palestinian ‘problem’ at the same time. But will it work? And whilst the Bush/Blair alliance is happy to bleat about Saddam Hussein’s reign of terror, for decades the USUK was quite happy to turn a blind eye to the US puppet, the Shah of Iran’s reign of terror (and even supported the Ayotollah in the early days when it looked like a left-leaning, anti-western government would replace the Shah), the Feisal’s in Saudi Arabia, and the various and sundry petty potentates of the United Arab Emirates, not to mention USUK’s cynical support of Saddam Hussein, Muburak in Egypt, the right-wing Christian fundamentalist Falangists in Lebanon, King Hussein of Jordan. The list is long but the current onslaught only makes sense when put in the context of western imperialist ambitions following the collapse of the ‘Evil Empire’ in 1989. Who are the players? Whilst I am sure I’ll be accused of being a conspiracy nut, let’s look at who the players are in this latest US adventure starting with William Kristol, editor of the right-wing Weekly Standard, which published an Open Letter to President Bush a few days after 911, which asserted that it was imperative to "remove Saddam Hussein from power" and to "retaliate" against Syria and Iran. Kristol is also head of The Project for the New American Century and a former hack for Enron where he was paid $100,000 to say nice things about Enron in the columns of his publication. The Washington Post critic Howard Kurtz wrote that, "He…[Kristol, has] become part of Washington's circulatory system, this half-pol, half-pundit, full-throated advocate with the nice-guy image," who is "...wired to nearly all the Republican presidential candidates." (Feb 2000.) The Open Letter was published in the Weekly Standard, which was founded by Kristol with a $10 million gift from the ultra-rightwing press baron Rupert Murdoch. 41 leading neo-conservatives are all signatories to the Open Letter, including: Norman Podhoretz, editor of the right-wing Encounter magazine, and his wife, Midge Decter, also a writer with ultra-rightwing credentials Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Studies Robert Kagan, also of the Weekly Standard Charles Krauthammer of the Washington Post, and, of course Richard Perle, ‘prince of darkness’ who is also a director of the Jersulem Post which is owned by right-wing Zionists And of course, the other suspects who are by now, well known to us but it’s worth listing them nevertheless: Paul Wolfowitz, father of the invasion of Iraq, is No. 2 in the Defense Dept. Douglas Feith, friend of Perle, heads the Pentagon Planning Board John Bolton is a State Department Undersecretary Eliot Abrams, responsible for the Middle East in the National Security Council, heavily embroiled in the Iran-Contra-Israel scandal. Another Iran-Contra player and convicted felon, Oliver North, is a member of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs Michael Ledeen, also involved in the Iran-Contra scandal, advocates total war not only against Iraq, but also against Israel's other enemies, Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian Authority Dov Zakheim who is comptroller for the Defense Department. Along with Vice-President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, nearly all are associated with the "Project for the New American Century", the ‘bible’ for US world domination. Other key players include: Meyrav Wurmser, Director of the Center for Middle East Policy at the Hudson Institute who also writes for the Jerusalem Post and is co-founder of the Middle East Media Research Institute which according to the Guardian is connected to Israeli Army Inlelligence. Meyrav's husband, Davis Wurmser, is at Perle's American Enterprise Institute, in charge of Middle East Studies. William Safire of the New York Times and an avid supporter of Ariel Sharon And Perle associate, Robert Bartley, who is the editor of the Wall Street Journal. The Christian Fundamentalist connection Extreme right-wing Christian fundamentalists, who now control Bush's Republican Party include: Jerry Falwell of the Moral Majority, who got a jet plane as a present from Menachem Begin, former prime minister of Israel. Pat Robertson of the Christian Coalition and the Christian Broadcasting Network, which help to finance the Christian Embassy in Jerusalem of J.W. van der Hoeven, an organisation that supports the settlers and their right-wing allies. Last but not least we have General Jay Garner, an ideological partner of Paul Wolfowitz and the neo-conservatives, who has been appointed head of the occupying forces in Iraq. In 2001, he signed a petition organized by the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, praising the Israeli Army for "remarkable restraint in the face of lethal violence orchestrated by the leadership of the Palestinian Authority," After leaving the army in 1997, he became a defense contractor specializing in missiles. This year he obtained a defense contract for $1.5 billion, as well as a contract for building Patriot systems in Israel. Media complicity It is important to note the role of the mass media in this gallery of rogues as it includes influential writers on the main mouthpieces for US imperialism, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and of course, Murdoch’s Fox News Network. (For more the media’s role in pumping up the war, see http://www.fair.org/) But will it work? On paper, the USUK/Israeli alliance looks fine. Taken together, the military might of the alliance has no opposition. And with Israel’s Weapons of Mass Destruction, a Sword of Damocles hanging over the captive populations of the Arab world, who is to stop them? Yet of course, the world has changed. USUKIsrael can no longer count on the EU and global opposition to the warmongers plans is almost total. Yet is this enough to reign in the ambitions of the imperialists? If it’s simply down to military might, it’s obviously no contest. The question we must ask is whether or not USUK can carry out its plans using only its military dominance? The US economy is in dire straights. Indeed Western capitalism is in the throes of a crisis comparable only to the Crash of 1929. They are moreover, divided along a fault line which hinges along the issue of global warming and the potential environmental catastrophe the planet faces. A catastrophe which in no small part, is the result of unrestrained consumption, primarily by the US. In 1990, when the first climate conference took place in Rio, it is instrumental to note that it was the countries of Europe which first took on board the longer term implications of climate change, led by the then Chancellor Kohl of Germany. And in spite of all the fine words at the time, Clinton and later Bush Snr wouldn’t back them up with deeds. At first sight, it might appear that the issue of the planet’s biosphere and the imperialist ambitions for global domination are unconnected, yet the two are intimately linked through oil. The fault line then is the future of the capitalist economies and it’s the crossroads at which Europe as a whole and the US part company. Where does the UK fit into this game plan? Again, at first sight it’s difficult to determine what the Blair government stands to gain from its involvement. My own inclination is to put it down to tired old white men trying to recreate the empire of their dreams. For whatever the rationale was in the beginning of this disaster, it no longer holds. Are the interests of British capital tied to Europe or to the US? Blair has to decide. As it stands, he risks being caught in the middle of game he’s just not up to playing as he now in the league of the big guys. Current events back up my thesis. As the post-war scenario unravels, it’s clear that the Blair government is increasingly uneasy about the route the US warmongers are taking, though what he’ll be able to do about it is open to question. Not only because the WMDs have failed to materialize (though I’m sure the US will make sure they ‘turn up’ at some point). But crucially the handling by the USUK occupation forces is revealing to the world just how little they actually care about the Iraqi nation, its people and its culture. The trashing of Iraq’s national heritage while the ‘forces of freedom’ stood by and simply watched an act of cultural genocide being committed, and which is a crime against humanity (along with all the other crimes the USUK invasion has committed) under the UN Convention on Human Rights. Already, there is talk of the actual complicity by the USUK occupation forces in this crime. In addition, it’s clear that what actually faced the invading forces, far from being some kind of bloodthirsty army bent on taking over the Middle East and points North, South, East and West was in actuality, the rag tag remains of an army and a country that has been bombed into submission for the past twelve years. History repeating itself? The Balfour declaration of 1917, that promised the Jews a homeland in Palestine, was the brainchild of Lord Palmerston and Lord Shaftesbury. Palestine was selected because of its strategic position in relation to the Suez Canal and Britain’s control of the canal which it ‘stole’ from the French and the sea routes to its colonial possessions in the Far East. Richard Perle’s ‘grand plan’ echoes this vision which sees the occupation of the Arab nations and their oil whilst advancing Sharon’s vision of a ‘Greater Israel’. Indeed, Perle has publicly stated this as an objective. What can we do? First and foremost, inform ourselves. The media onslaught on both sides of the Atlantic is formidable with even the supposedly anti-war London Independent going with the flow. To give you a taste of the kind of double-speak we have to deal with, here are just a few statements from today’s (April 16) edition: Concerning the ‘evidence’ that Colin Powell submitted to the UN in February on intelligence material ‘proving’ that Iraq had acquired uranium (yellowcake) from an African country, the US now admits that it was "forged by a Western intelligence agency, possibly MI6 or Mossad." The Independent incredulously states the following: "The obvious question is: if President Hussein had such weapons, why didn’t he use them?" Duh? Obvious question? Surely the obvious question to ask is why did MI6 or Mossad forge them in the first place and, why did Powell choose to use information that was so obviously a forgery? Could it be because it order to justify the invasion of a sovereign state is was necessary to invent a reason? And if so, why doesn’t the Independent (independent?) ask this question? Or, here’s another classic piece of newspeak: "But what precedent has the Iraq war set for solving the problems of WMD [Weapons of Mass Destruction] in other countries such as North Korea, Iran or Pakistan?" But why no mention of Israel? And given all the crocodile tears spilt over Hussein’s treatment of Shia and Kurdish minorities, it has this say without breaking its stride: "Any Shia rebellion is likely to be crushed by America and its sponsored Iraqi forces [My emph. WB], just as Saddam and his predecessors did in previous times." Crushed? What like Saddam crushed them? One of the reasons I thought USUK went to war for in the first place was to put a stop to this kind of behaviour! Or finally, the issue of the Iraqi National Congress, headed by convicted felon Ahmed Chalabi (he embezzled $70 million from the Jordanian-based Petra bank and was sentenced to 22 years hard labour in abstentia) about which the Independent says: "…the most visible [in Iraq] exile opposition group before the war…" Visible? Who says? The Pentagon that’s who. Or, if you prefer, let the head of the INC in Washington tell us just how visible he or the INC is to the Iraqis: "They may not know the man. But he represents their views." Oh really? And why no mention of the INC’s connection to US oil interests? "The INC is quietly courting the American oil companies. In mid-October, Chalabi had a series of meetings with three major U.S. oil firms in Washington. "The oil people are naturally nervous," says INC spokesman Zaab Sethna, who took part in the meetings between Chalabi and the oil executives. "We've had discussions with them, but they're not in the habit of going around talking about them." That's true. In interviews, oil company officials speak cautiously and only on background about Iraq, laughing nervously at the idea of being quoted. They are extremely wary of associating themselves with the INC or with U.S. war plans for fear of angering Saudi Arabia and other oil-producing countries in the Persian Gulf. Asked about talks with the INC, one U.S. oil executive blanched, saying, "I can't discuss that, even on background."" For more on this puppet of US oil interests see http://www.prospect.org/print/V13/21/dreyfuss-r.html from which this extract is taken. If I can find it in about 10 seconds on Google, why can’t the Independent? Perhaps it doesn’t want to? I could go on but it hardly seems worth it. I’d rather you, the reader use this incredibly powerful tool we have, the Internet, to do your own investigating. After all, I’m not paid to do this, I just have an abiding interest and concern about what happens to the planet I live on. Credits I am grateful to Uri Avnery an Israeli journalist for some of the source material for this essay. His essays are included in The Other Israel: Voices of Refusal and Dissent (http://www.counterpunch.org/avnery04102003.html) 

   From the International Press Centre               
Sharon, Bush and the race for ‘Greater Israel’
 By Patrick Seale 17 October 2003
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his friends in Washington are in a hurry. They are racing to achieve their objectives before anyone stops them. And when they are in a hurry, they are particularly dangerous. Syria and Iran are in their sights, with further down the road Saudi Arabia, and even Egypt. Political and economic pressure, financial penalties, sanctions, intervention, regime change by military force, these are their chosen instruments for bending the Arabs to the will of Israel and its United States patron. Sharon’s main objective is the building of a “Greater Israel” on the ruins of Palestinian nationalism. His latest instrument is the wall or separation barrier which is imprisoning the Palestinians on a fraction of their territory, cutting them off on all sides from contact with their Arab neighbors. The wall is due to be finished in eight months’ time. Sharon is determined that nothing must prevent its completion. At the UN Security Council this week, he won a major victory when the United States vetoed a resolution, proposed by Syria, condemning the wall. Within hours, a radical Palestinian group attacked the motorcade of an American delegation in Gaza, killing three Americans and wounding a fourth. Sharon will no doubt exploit this latest incident to rally American opinion against the beleaguered Palestinian president, Yasser Arafat. Sharon’s main worry, however, and the reason for his haste, is that George W. Bush could be thrown out of office at next year’s US presidential election ­ and with him the whole band of pro-Israeli neoconservatives which have set the administration’s agenda since Sept. 11, 2001. These are the men who pressed for war against Iraq as a first step toward reshaping the geopolitics of the entire Middle East. But the sluggish US economy, the mess in Iraq, and the anti-American anger sweeping the Arab and Muslim world are now making Bush look vulnerable. A Democrat in the White House may not be so tolerant of Israel’s foolhardy ambitions or so ready to endorse the neocons’ aggressive policies. Sharon has other worries closer to home. The political fallout from the current police investigations of his two sons, Omri and Gilad, for alleged sharp practice and bribe-taking could drive Sharon himself from office in 2004. And to compound his fears, the Israeli left which for the past two years has seemed terminally ill and politically irrelevant is showing faint signs of revival. Leading opposition figures such as Yossi Beilin, Amram Mitzna and Avraham Burg have joined with Palestinian moderates, led by Yasser Abed Rabbo, in drafting a detailed peace plan for a two-state solution ­ the so-called Geneva Accords. The plan, the result of two years of secret negotiations funded by the Swiss government, is due to be signed formally in Geneva next month, putting flesh on the bones of the tentative agreements reached at Taba in January 2001. It represents everything that Sharon and his friends detest and which he has spent his life seeking to destroy. It provides for an Israeli withdrawal to the 1967 borders (with some marginal modifications) to allow for the emergence of a viable Palestinian state; some major settlements close to the Green Line to be annexed to Israel but those deep inside Palestinian territory to be evacuated; Jerusalem as a shared capital; Palestinian sovereignty over the Haram al-Sharif (Temple Mount); Israeli sovereignty over the Wailing Wall and the Jewish quarter of the Old City; and ­ a major Palestinian concession ­ the abandonment of the “right of return” to towns and villages lost in 1948. An international force would monitor implementation of the plan while radical Palestinian groups would be tamed and shut down. These Geneva Accords may, in the present climate, seem hopelessly utopian. They have no chance whatsoever of being implemented while the Sharon government, or anything resembling it, is in power. Their potential importance, however, lies in offering the Israeli public what it lacks and longs for most ­ hope that the nightmare of killing and counter-killing can be brought to an end. In other words, a change in Washington, and a move back to the center by an Israeli public won over by a credible peace plan, could yet pose a threat to Sharon’s ambitions. He has reacted to the Geneva Accords with barely suppressed rage. “By what right,” he snorted, “are left-wing people proposing moves that Israel can never do, nor will ever do!” Sharon has always wanted one 100 percent of Palestine, an ambition which would have involved expelling most, if not all, of the Palestinian population of the West Bank to Jordan, which would then have become a Palestinian state. As the obstacles to such a project are formidable, Sharon has opted for something a shade more modest: the seizure of about 90 percent of historic Palestine, confining the Palestinians to some 10 percent of the overall territory behind the notorious wall. No doubt he calculates that, once the wall is finished, it will in due course come to be accepted by the international community, and by the Palestinians themselves, as defining Israel’s borders. Hence, his determination, and that of his American supporters, to move ahead with all possible speed while the regional and international environment is in their favor. Sharon’s major asset is President Bush himself. Backing off from engagement in the Arab-Israeli conflict, the Bush administration appears to have decided to leave Israel to manage the Palestine problem on its own terms. So much is clear from its veto of UN Resolutions condemning the wall and Sharon’s recent strike inside Syrian territory, from its silence over continued settlement expansion and from its failure to react to Israel’s massive destruction of Palestinian property at Rafah, on Gaza’s border with Egypt, which this week left 1,500 Palestinians homeless. As he nervously prepares for his election campaign, his ratings slipping in the polls, Bush’s collapse before Sharon must be judged one of the blackest pages in recent American history. It has provoked incredulity in Europe and, more ominously, bitter hatred of the United States in Muslim communities around the world. Yet, Sharon has much cause for satisfaction: While Israel faces no strategic threat, its enemies tremble. A shattered Iraq is under American occupation; Iran, facing great international pressure over its alleged nuclear weapons program, is wracked by internal conflicts between conservatives and reformers; the Arab Gulf, seemingly indifferent and content, lies under America’s military umbrella; Egypt, neutralized by its peace treaty with Israel and by America’s annual subsidy, hardly dares open its mouth in defense of the Palestinians; while Syria faces harsh and threatening pressure on all sides ­ from Washington, now preparing to vote into law the economic and diplomatic boycotts enshrined in the Syria Accountability Act; and from Israel, which last week sent its planes to strike at Syria and seems ready to do so again. Sharon still thinks he can bludgeon the Palestinians into submission. The attack on the Palestinian camp near Damascus, together with Israel’s repeated incursions at Rafah, are clearly intended as warnings to Syria and Egypt to halt all support for the Palestinians ­ or face the consequences. But Sharon has not yet found an answer to the suicide bombers who have traumatized the Israel public, ruined the economy, killed the tourist trade and cut off foreign investment. They are a profound embarrassment to Sharon, but he may think it a price worth paying. His priority is land, not security. That, he believes, will follow once the wall is built and the Palestinians surrender. The sources (The Daily Star). 

                           
                      
 Media Monitors Network

Israel's Grand Design:
Leaders Crave Area from Egypt to Iraq
by John Mitchell Henshaw

Nearly 34 years ago, an America-firster used The American Mercury magazine to warn of the danger posed by Zionism and its rule of Washington and the Mideast. John Henshaw wrote this article shortly after Israel laid claim to the annexed land  during 1967 Arab-Israeli war. This article first appeared in the spring of 1968.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*

The metamorphosis of tiny Israel from a midget to a giant is in the making. The grand design of Judaic-Zionist expansionist doctrine is to seize all the oil-rich lands from the shores of the Euphrates to the banks of the Nile.

In defining the aims of Zionism, Hebrew scholar Levnoch Osman recently said: "In our eternal Book of Books (the Torah), the lofty ethical teachings of which are cherished by all mankind, the land of Israel is described not as a long, narrow strip of land with wavy, crooked borders, but as a state with broad natural borders. God has promised to Patriarch Abraham the following:

"I give unto them the land where they have sown their seed, from the river of Egypt unto the great river of Euphrates’ (Genesis 15:18). And so, in order to realize the words of this prophecy, the Israeli state had to continue, not in the borders it has today but within its broad historical boundaries."

And as far back as 1952 Moshe Dayan, the present Israeli defense minister, declared:

"Our task consists of preparing the Israeli army for the new war approaching in order to achieve our ultimate goal, the creation of an Israeli empire."

The British historian Arnold J. Toynbee, who served as an adviser on Near Eastern affairs to the British delegation at the Versailles Conference, in a newspaper article published in June last year stated the Zionist aims in these words:

We are Jews, the living representatives of Judah, one of the 12 tribes of Israel that conquered most of Palestine in the 13th century B.C. We held Judah’s share of the conquered territory for seven centuries, till we were deported by Nebuchadnezzer in 587 B.C. We were back again within less than half a century, and we then held Judea, once more, for the next 773 years, till we were evicted by the Romans in A.D. 135. We have never renounced our claim to the land of Israel. We have always hoped, believed, and proclaimed that we shall get this land back again. It is our land, we contend.

After another 1,883 years we did recover a foothold there in 1918, and during the half-century since then, by devoted hard work, ability and military valor, we have built up our present national State of Israel, and have inflicted three smashing defeats on the Arabs, who have been trying to evict us again.

We want to have a country of our own again, like other peoples and like our own ancestors. We also need to have a country of our own, because, since the conversion of the Roman empire to Christianity in the fourth century A.D., we have been penalized and persecuted by the Western Christian majority among whom we have had to live.

The persecution has culminated in the unprecedented crime of genocide, which has been committed against us in our lifetime by a Western people, the Germans, in Europe. We are not going to let the Arabs commit the same crime of genocide against us here, in our own land of Israel.

Genocide in Six-day War

Apologist Toynbee omitted mentioning the fact that the Jews themselves are currently engaged in genocide. During the Sis-Day War last summer, Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Dayan ordered Brig. Gen. Yesha’ahu Gavish, the Israeli commander of the Sinai campaign, to ruthlessly drive the hapless Egyptian troops into the Sinai Desert to die of thirst, hunger and heat. Temperature on the arid Sinai rise to more than 100 degrees during the day. For over two weeks thousand of wretched Egyptian stragglers wandered over the swirling wastes finally drop dead in their tracks.

U.S. reconnaissance planes flying on the perimeter of the Sinai Desert took hundreds of pictures of the stragglers and reported there were 50,000 Egyptians dead or dying on the desert at the time. The U.S. Air Force loaded 60,000 gallons of water in five-gallon jerry-cans on pallets and prepared to drop them in the area where stragglers were observed. However, Defense Secretary Robert McNamara ordered the projected mission of mercy halted after he received phone calls from White House foreign policy-planner Walt Rostow and UN Ambassador Arthur Goldberg.

This flagrant violation of the Geneva Convention on the treatment of prisoners of war amounted to genocide, designed to destroy a whole nation. Newspaper reporters visiting the war zones in Syria and Jordan, reported that if one sniper in a village fired on Israeli troops, the whole village was destroyed including the women and children. Napalm is frequently used. This systematic extermination is an ideological doctrine of Zionism. The leading exponent of genocide is the chauvinist Moshe Dayan, whom the Zionists have proclaimed a Biblical "messiah" on a white horse. Arrogant, boastful Gen. Yitzhak Rabin, chief of the Israeli General Staff, who plotted and executed the Six-Day blitzkrieg last June, is in direct charge of the projected expansionist program from the Euphrates to the Nile.

The scope of this ambitious scheme of territorial seizures and exploitation has been recognized by at least a few of our American military strategists for years. This writer recalls that a dozen years ago an Army lieutenant colonel, who was a student at the War College, confined that some of his instructors believed the Zionist expansionist policy would provide the spark to ignite World War III.

(Incidentally, the then lieutenant colonel is now one of the top commanding generals in Vietnam.)

By guile, treachery and bloodletting, the Zionists plot to annex all of Jordan, virtually all of Syria, half of Iraq and a large part of Saudi Arabia and all of the rich cotton lands of the Nile Valley. It would be a simpler matter then to grab Yemen, Aden, Muscat, Qatar and Oman with their rich oil development. Israel is already well advanced in the development of its first nuclear warhead.

According to the Zionists’ schedule of operations, within a decade the Israeli empire be the master of the Middle East and take its place as a nuclear superpower on equal footing with the Soviet Union and the United States. David Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company will pay its royalties to the Israeli military usurpers instead of the Arab sheiks.

Fabulous Oil Reserves

The stakes are high in this traditionally British-protected region. The Persian Gulf and adjacent countries hold 70 percent of the non-communist world’s oil reserves and produce half of its oil output. British with-drawl from Aden creates a power vacuum that will inevitably be filled by Israel and the Soviet Union.

The British have expressed the pious hope that their withdrawal would galvanize the Arab rulers into dropping their feuds and really unite in a mutual defense pact. However, the spreading oil boom is intensifying the territorial ambitions of rival kingdoms, sultanates and sheikdoms. Iran is selling oil to Israel, another aggravating factor in Mideast tensions. Like the tentacles of an octopus the Israeli armed forces struck out in all directions into Jordan, Syria and Egypt in Israel’s Six-Day aggression. Last June. Even when encountering no resistance, the Israeli armored forces abruptly halted at predetermined strategic terrain points; they had accomplished their mission in the first phase of the Zionist Grand Design of imperialistic conquest. It was time to stop and consolidate their gains rather than risk spreading their forces too thin. Israeli leader Menachem Begin says:

"The return of even one bit of earth to the Arab would be a betrayal of the nation."

The grandiose idea of an Israeli empire controlling the Middle East is now for the first time arousing great popular enthusiasm among Jews everywhere in the worldOfficially Israel is continuing the pretense of keeping the door open to negotiations that might result in return of the conquered territory, in exchange for Arab recognition of Israel and peace treaty. Jordan’s King Hussein has reportedly already made a secret and desperate offer to Israel: In exchange for the return of the West Bank of the Jordan River, Hussein agreed to demilitarize it, negotiate border adjustments and even waive his insistence upon regaining the Old City of Jerusalem. Israel rejected the offer. Israeli Minister of Labor Yigal Allon bluntly stated:

"The natural border of the country is the Jordan River – a border that would be established only if Israel kept the West Bank areas it took from Jordan."

Gen. Aluf Ezer Weizmann, second highest-ranking officer in the Israeli army, is even more adamant: "We shall stay where we are and bring in Jews. We now have the unusual opportunity to consolidate the state for the Jewish people and help prevent future wars."

"If there is a fourth war," Defense Minister Moshe Dayan gloats, "we are in a position to win more decisively than ever." And he warned that in the "fourth war" the great cities of Cairo, Damascus and Amman will be annihilated. This is in conformity with the genocidal plan.

Israel's Grand Design - Zionists' Dream of Greater Israel

Zionist have their eyes set on all of the land between the Nile and the Euphrates. The plan for a "Greater Israel" is as old as Zionism itself.

Israelis bitterly complain that along with the occupied territory that is three times the size of Israel, they have inherited its population of 1,330,000 Arabs.

Aliyah – voluntary relocation to Israel – has been a flop as far as Western Jews are concerned – few of them want to go to the Holy Land of their forefathers. The majority of Jews now in Israel are from Asia and Africa.

The System of government in Israel is a mixture of theocracy and gerontocracy. Full citizenship requires membership in the Jewish religion and Jewish ancestry. Israeli authorities refuse to accept Arabs or "Gentiles" (non-Jews) as full citizens with equal civil, political, and economic rights. Militant Zionists frankly admit that Israel and neighboring Arab nations cannot coexist. They claim that the incompatibility is due to ideological fanaticism. However, the Arab oil lands are fabulously rich.

"We must take steps leading to a long-range consolidation, lest we be considered a temporary, transient factor in the occupied areas," declares Israel Galili, minister without portfolio in the Israeli Cabinet.

The Zionists have invented the term "coercive noninterference" in explaining how they force the subjugated Arabs to cooperate with their conquerors. When the mayor of Nablus announced that he would resign rather than front for the Jews, the Israeli military officers told him that no one would be appointed to replace him, which would result in utter chaos. They mayor had second thoughts, stayed and obeyed the Jewish military commanders. Hundreds of similar examples could be cited.

Arabs Fear Genocide

"The Middle East today is dominated by raw, naked, savage, animal fear. The Arab nations are driven by the fear of mass death, by the fear of Israel’s genocidal intentions toward them. Israel, by bringing in immigrants from all over the world, has upset the demographic balance of the Middle East.

"The first basic fact about populations is that they multiply. They population of Israel is increasing, and the populations of the Arab nations are increasing. In the conflict between populations, either Arabs or Jews must someday end up being driven into arid desert wastes which will not support them, where they will find relief only in the oblivion of death. Israel means to kill the Arab populations and to occupy their lands. The Arabs, driven by fear of death, react powerfully. They seek the protection of a powerful nation, Russia, to which they will become tributary in return for protection…

"For the free world, this is a practically irretrievable disaster," says Benjamin H. Freedman.

We might well rationalize all this as strictly none of our business except that hundred of millions of American foreign aid dollars are being spend for the enrichment of the international Zionist network extending from Tel Aviv to Paris, London and New York. The Israelis are already pumping oil from Egyptian wells and splitting the profits with Rockefeller’s Standard Oil combine. This is only the prelude.

Now for the first time Soviet Russia is successfully penetrating the oil-rich Mideast countries. The Russians have made agreements to explore for oil in Iraq, Iran and Egypt. They have extended bids for cooperative ventures to Algeria, Syria and Kuwait. The agreement with Iraq provides for development of oil reserves in an area taken away from Western companies.

Most of the Arab oil countries are starting oil firms to give them a stronger hold on their petroleum reserves and a bigger bit on profits. They have also recently hiked their royalties they get from the big Anglo-American oil firms.

The Soviets furnish the technical know-how to the Arab oil industry and work out world marketing agreement with the Arab rulers. The Soviet naval fleet is standing in the Mediterranean. The Kremlin has launched an aggressive campaign to establish a protectorate over the Mideast oil lands. Russia finally has a firm grip on Egypt. Syria is now totally dependent on Soviet weapons and the protective arm of Moscow. The Soviets have a facility in Latakia.

Yemen is receiving Soviet arms, Russian advisers are training its army, and Soviet armed forces are establishing base facilities in Yemen. After all the millions the U.S. gave Iran in foreign aid, the ungrateful shah (who has $300 million stashed away in Swiss banks) is co-operating with the Soviets in construction of a natural gas pipeline that would feed Iranian gas to parts of Russia not easily served by Russian gas.

The sub-rosa partnership between Zionism and communism is still a fact. As Israel drives the Arabs into the arms of the Kremlin, Israel expands, fulfilling a grand design and an aggressive plan agreed upon years ago. And like the Arabs, Americans are helpless victims in this international crime.

The late John Henshaw was chief legman for columnist Drew Pearson, who later broke with Pearson. At that time, Henshaw’s expenses were paid by the Anti-Defamation League, a lobby for Israel, which had a "special relationship" with Pearson. Thus Henshaw’s Middle East insights are unique.

Source:

by courtesy & © 1968-2002The American Mercury Magazine & Republished in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,



Life under Larsen revealed by Antarctic survey
Monday February 26, 05:00 PM By Catherine Brahic
A voyage to explore the marine life beneath a vast sheet of Antarctic sea ice has enjoyed great success, uncovering new species and terrain ranging from barren to teeming with fast-growing life. The barely known ecosystems below Antarctic ice sheets are described as "the last marine frontier" by researchers. The Polarstern expedition found a new species of giant crustacean and sea-cucumbers that had previously only been seen in the deep sea in any number. View a gallery of the incredible (Advertisement) creatures revealed . The investigation was made possible by the collapse of the Larsen ice-sheet in northeast Antarctica, which disintegrated in two stages. First, Larsen A fell apart in 1995. Then, in 2002, a massive chunk of ice, 3250 square kilometres in area and 220 metres thick, broke off. The disintegration of Larsen B made headlines worldwide and was seen as a sign of the dramatic consequences of global warming (see Giant Antarctic ice sheet breaks off ). For biologists, it opened a realm that had been virtually inaccessible. The area under Larsen B has been capped by ice since the last ice age. "The break-up of these ice shelves opened up huge, near pristine portions of the ocean floor, sealed off from above for at least 5000 years, and possibly up to 12,000 years in the case of Larsen B," says Julian Gutt, a marine ecologist at Germany's Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research and chief scientist on the Polarstern expedition. "Until now, scientists have glimpsed life under Antarctica's ice shelves only through drill holes." As part of a new Census of Antarctic Marine Life (CAML), Gutt led a 10-week voyage to the area which used to lie under Larsen A and B. The seabed varied in depth, between 100 metres and 850 m beneath the surface. In order to explore, the researchers sent down a remotely-operated submarine which captured video footage and collected samples. The researchers discovered extremely varied environments in their explorations, which concluded on 30 January. In shallower areas, where the several-hundred metre thick ice shelf had scraped along the bottom, the seabed was barren and carved with parallel grooves left by the glaciers as they moved out to sea. In other areas, the seabed teamed with life. Gutt believes some of these animals and plants have moved into the area since the collapse of the ice shelves. He mentions the great number and density of fast-growing sea-squirts - transparent tube-like animals that attach themselves to the seafloor. Under Larsen B, the sea-squirts are about five years old, which corresponds closely with when the shelf collapsed. He was also stunned to find a great number of sea cucumbers, normally found 2000 m beneath the surface. The researchers are uncertain why these species were found in such shallow waters, but note that both the deep sea and the underside of ice shelves have very poor resources in common. "The sea cucumbers belong to that fauna which I believe were found originally under the ice shelf," says Gutt. Small clusters of dead clamshells on the ocean floor suggested the past presence of a very rare "cold seep" - a seabed vent which would have spewed methane and sulphides. Such vents can create temporary habitats for life in otherwise barren environments. But when such seeps run dry, the communities that rely on them starve. Among the potential new species found during the trip were: - 15 new shrimp-like amphipod species, including one that was 10 centimetres long, making it one of largest ever seen in Antarctica - Four new species of cnidarians - organisms related to coral, jelly fish and sea anemones - Two new species of octopus The researchers have brought specimens back and will now compare them to known species to see if they are indeed new. CAML is run by the Census of Marine Life. It has 13 expeditions planned during the International Polar Year, which launches on 1 March 2007. The Polarstern expedition brought together 52 researchers from 14 countries. Check back later for videos from the voyages.
Mysteries
of the Deep Sea -The deep sea is one of the harshest habitats on Earth, but is home to many remarkable creatures. Learn more in our comprehensive special report .



http://geocities.com/operationshekhinah2/two.html

New Addition -- June 2004

Video on Internet of settler saying 
"Nile to Euphrates" belongs to the Jews

Some folks say that our Greater Israel web page is ridiculous and that Israelis today do not believe that most of the Middle East belongs to the Jews because of an ancient promise to Abraham (which if even interpreted fairly would mean Arabs and Jews, not just Jews alone). Of course, their quick denial is because they do not actually read all the material and visit the more extensive evidence through the many links we provide. The reality is that there are many Israelis who do not lay claim to all of the Middle East stretching out to the Euphrates river. But there are many who do, and many of these many happen to be the most aggressive and fanatical settlers in the West Bank and Gaza. Please do not forget that Ariel Sharon used to be the Housing Minister who greatly encouraged the establishment of these settlements (illegal colonies to put it more bluntly). You can count on it that he does know what these people stand for and that any so-called plans for any kind of unilateral withdrawal or peace plans are just Sharon's latest trickery. Here below we have some new evidence.

Our alfredlilienthal.com webstats tell us where a visitor has come from -- for instance Google search, or some Mideast related website, or from a specific message board. Sometimes I go and visit the place of origin. At one message board that resulted several days ago, I found discussion about the idea of whether Israel has designs on expanding into the rest of the Middle East. Someone there had posted this information below. I checked it out and found it valid. Although I do not know Dutch, you can tell from the written words on the screen at the point where Tigris and Euphrates are being said by the settler named Yossi Neumann that the words match. Someone who knew Dutch had translated what was actually said into English at the message board.

When you click on the video link at the website, pick Real Player as your viewer. Once the video appears, click on the (r) on the right of the play bar and choose "Play in Real Player". That will put it into a mode where you can see the minutes and seconds going by. Then click and hold on the knob toward the left on the play bar (it is shaped like this:  >| with a circle around it. This will fast forward the video with the minutes showing. Go to about 11:00. Soon after (about 11:20) will be the statement by the settler and a map that shows the area of Greater Israel. The rest of the video from start to finish is very good (even without understanding most of what is said) and shows many scenes of the horrors done to the Palestinians and the contrasting comfortable lifestyle of the settlers. Of course we do not see such scenes on American TV reports.

Here is what was actually posted at the message board. I have corrected the spelling from Eufrates to Euphrates. Suzanne Nicole, webmaster for Alfred M. Lilienthal

A mainstreampolitical program on Dutch public television called 2-Today not only showed the relationship between Sharon's Likud Fraction, his IDF and the Gush Emunim Settlers but also interviews in which Zionist Settlers propagate that the Zionist State is from the Nile (in Egypt) to the Euphrates (in Iraq) and that this is government policy.

The program continues by showing footage of an animated picture of the 'Greater Israel' and how it occupies the Arab peninsula.

Following transcript corresponds to the minutes 11.40 - 12.20 on the video.

Watch 2-Today-Click Video

 Yossi Neumann, the settler (colonist is the term in the video), says:

We Jews read the bible and believe that our forefathers were told what the borders are of the Promised Land.

From the Euphrates & the Tigris in the north till the Nile in the south.

 The narrator says:

That is the religious dream of the colonists, the Jewish state from the Nile in the south till the Euphrates in the north. .

The animated picture map shows not only an occupied Palestine, but an expanding Israel that reaches throughout most of the Middle East.


Is there any independent confirmation of King Saud's  and Bin Laden's claim (if the reported tape is actually from him) of this grander Zionist scheme for taking over  the entire Middle East as Greater Israel? Note that Saud claimed this was being taught in Israeli schools back in 1954.

An Honorable American Witness

Photo 1974 -- now deceased

Edwin Wright was born in Iran of missionary parents and knew the area well.  He also studied Hebrew, and when assigned to the Near East issues at the U.S. State Department during the Truman years, he went to Palestine to find out for himself what was really going on.  Here are some of his findings as given in his "Oral History" interview for the Truman Library.

This period is very important for what I have to say about serving under President Truman, because while I was there I realized that there was going to be a war between Jews and Arabs; that was just certain. This was because of the concepts of the two societies. One has to get into the attitude of mind and the philosophy of these two societies to understand this problem.

I made a special study of Zionism, and I talked with as many people as I could find who were the leaders of the Zionist community. I interviewed Golda Meir at that time; she was then labor secretary. I had conversations with Reuven Zaslani, who later was called Shiloah (all these people changed their names later on); Dov Joseph, who became the mayor of Jerusalem during the war; and Teddy Kolleck. I made a special effort to meet them, talk with them, and find out what Zionism is; what it stands for. I also found that there was a school in Tel Aviv, known as the Gymnasia Herzliya. It was the training school in which most of the modern leaders of Israel had gone; Moshe Dyan and others. I talked with a number of the teachers and professors there. I felt that this was a school dedicated to inculcating and indoctrinating [Theodor] Herzl's ideas into the minds of the young Jews in Palestine. [See: Moshe Menuhin, The Decadence of Judaism in our Times, Exposition Banner Book, 1965. He was a graduate of this school.]

At that time many of Herzl's writings were not yet translated into English. In fact, they were not translated until 1952, so no one had really any easy access to this material unless he knew German or Hebrew. I don't know either one of these very well. I studied some German and some Hebrew, but I talked with the people who were the professors there and also got to know Edwin Samuel, the son of Lord Samuel who was the first High Commissioner of Palestine.

With Edwin Samuel, I made trips all through the kubbutzim. We spent several days at Ein Geb, Mishmar Ha-Emek, and at various other of the kubbutzim. During this period I became convinced that Americans didn't know what Zionism was at all.

The material was not in English. There was very little of it known to America, and I came to the conclusion that it was a very dangerous type of philosophy of living.

What I found out was that Herzl had taught that all the Jews of the world should go to Israel. This was the idea that dominated the Yishuv (the Yishuv means the Jewish community of Palestine) and even Ben Gurion, who was at that time Secretary of the Jewish Agency.

The Jewish Agency was a shadow government. It already was a government of Israel; simply waiting for the veil to be pulled and it would emerge. It had all the functions of government. I found their ideas were that all Jews should leave the Gentile world. This is in Herzl: "Gentiles hate Jews, they are going to destroy the Jewish world." It's a paranoic view of things. The only way Judaism can be saved is for the Jews to leave the Gentile world completely; to go to a Jewish state, as Herzl put it in his book. There they would rule themselves and be able to get away from the hatred of the Gentile world. The Gentiles are out to destroy Judaism. [See: Theodore Herzl, The Jewish State, N.Y., 1943. Diaries in II Volumes]

I did not believe this. I think it's a false concept of society, and especially false of American society. Nevertheless, this is the foundation of Zionist thinking.

The second step was that this Jewish state must be in Palestine. This is the sacred home of the people; its literature was developed there, and their attitude was that Judaism cannot survive in any other place except Palestine itself. That's where it grew and germinated, and it's got to get back there in order to save itself. Otherwise, Jews are going to assimilate in other countries. Herzl himself made the statement that, when the Jewish state is set up, if a Jew does not go to live in it he is anti-Semitic because he chooses to live with Gentiles rather than live with Jews which are his real community.

I got all these ideas through talking with people who were Zionists. The third step in Zionism was that they must have large enough a state in order to keep the whole Jewish population there. At that time there were about fourteen million Jews, and now that meant owning a very large territory. It is not brought out in Zionist propaganda in America, but what they claim is all the territory from the Suez Canal clear north to the mountains of Cappadocia, in southern Turkey. [Statement by Herzl. Also see Numbers 34; Genesis 15:18, Joshua 13, II Samuel 8:5-6.} It includes all of Lebanon, much of Syria, Jordan, and Sinai. This is the territory they call "Eretz Israel," the land of Israel, which is mentioned in the Bible.

Furthermore, in the Bible you will find the boundaries of "Eretz Israel" as given by God. There are several places these are found, Numbers, the 34th Chapter and so forth.

One of the men whom I discussed this with was Rabbi Meyer Berlin, the Chief Rabbi in the Mizrachi group. These are the ultra-orthodox group, who accept the Old Testament literally. Everything that it says is exactly just as it's described.

This means from the Nile to the Euphrates --
 just as King Saud warned in 1954.

See Edwin Wright's complete interview statement:

http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/wright.htm



Truman listened to Clark Clifford and other ignorant people who never cared to find out the facts as Ed Wright did. Truman later covered up his own blame by calling good men in the State Department like Wright:  Arabist anti-Semites. President Truman could have known the truth and protected the Palestinians and other Arabs if he had listened to Secretary of State George Marshall and other advisors who told him not to sponsor and recognize a "Jewish" state based on racial and religious discrimination toward non-Jews.  Instead, Truman foolishly listened to Zionist American schemers like Abraham Feinberg who raised the initial money for Truman's 1948 re-election campaign.  This disgraceful conduct by an American President has been repeated in one form or another by many American leaders since.  Read about the showdown between Clifford and Marshall at this link to see how a half century of horror in the Middle East could have been prevented.

Remembering General George Marshall’s
 Clash With Clark Clifford
 Over Premature Recognition of Israel

By Dr. Alfred M. Lilienthal

June 1999

http://www.alfredlilienthal.com/marshallclifford.htm

NOTE:  General and now Secretary of State Colin Powell has called George Marshall the greatest Man of War and the greatest Man of Peace that America has ever known.  Let us hope that Powell and others now will find the honor and courage of Marshall and refuse to support any of President Bush's future wars against other Mideast nations.

 Will even more innocent Americans and Arabs
(beyond what is already happening in Iraq)
  -- as well as innocent Jews in Israel and the U.S.
 who oppose extremist Zionism --
 now die because we have been denied
 the facts for over 50 years?


 WHAT IS THE BEST WAY WE CAN OPPOSE 
 THIS WAR AND OTHERS FOR ISRAEL? 

Read now this important article
by former Congressman Paul Findley:

Liberating America From Israel
http://www.alfredlilienthal.com/liberating_america_from_israel.htm


 What Price Israel? 

50th Anniversary Edition 1953 - 2003
With Brand New 16-Page Introduction
(reflecting current events) 
Available Now -- Click Here:
Online Selections From
What Price Israel?

 

 Greater Israel "LINKS" 
All the references on this web page
and many other articles we recommend.

http://www.alfredlilienthal.com/greaterisrael_links.htm


END OF PRESENT REPORT
as of August 1, 2003



Family faces talks over obese schoolboy
Click here to play video
 


An eight-year-old boy who weighs 14 stone is waiting to find out if he is to be taken into care.Connor McCreaddie from Tyneside is so overweight he can hardly walk and social services are deciding whether it amounts to child abuse.His mother Nicola McKeown, 35, has blamed doctors for failing to help the family.Connor weighed 15 stone 8lb - four times the weight of a healthy child of his age - before Christmas but has lost 1 stone 7lb since beginning an intensive exercise regime and swapping junk food for healthy alternatives two months ago.Ms McKeown, 35, sought help from professionals and the family have been getting assistance from health workers and a dietician.The family face a child protection conference with North Tyneside Council to discuss Connor's progress in losing weight.The last resort would be for social workers to place him in care but his mother is hopeful this will not happen.She said she had received little help from doctors and urged social workers to allow the family to look after Connor.She said: "I think it's really terrible. They've tried to say that I've neglected Connor and he should come under the child abuse Act, and I think it's really disgusting."Through Connor's weight gain there's been no-one there to step in. He's been going to doctors and stuff, he's been getting weighed, and no-one's actually stepped in and said `Look, there's a problem here, we have to get it sorted.'"So I asked for help and it's been offered but it hasn't been given yet."She said removing Connor into care would be "disastrous" for him."Taking him away from his family when he needs them to help him would be, I think, disastrous for Connor. I think it would make him worse."



Jade Makes Surprise Visit To India
 Monday February 26, 03:09 PM
Jade Goody has spoken exclusively to Sky News after making a surprise visit to India, following the Celebrity Big Brother race row.
The star made headlines around the world when she allegedly racially bullied Bollywood actress Shilpa Shetty in the reality TV house.
Correspondent Alex Crawford tracked down Goody in New Delhi. Looking relaxed, she said: "Obviously I've said my apologies.
I'm here on a private visit and I'm having meetings with certain people.
"She arrived in India declaring she was "trying to put the Big Brother stuff behind me".
The star - who chose to travel on the Indian airliner Jet Airways - said she had already spent the first few hours of her trip travelling
around the capital as a tourist. "I am here on a strictly private visit," she told Sky News. "I could have had my entire trip paid for and
 the people travelling with me could have been paid for but I didn't want that."I am paying for the trip and all the expenses myself. I don't want to be seen to be making money out of what happened."Asked whether she was here to do a deal with an Indian television company in an attempt to rehabilitate her floundering career, her agent Sally Andrews said: "No, this is not a business trip. It is strictly private."They also denied they would be meeting Indian politicians during the four-day visit
On being asked whether the row over her treatment of Shetty had "blown over", the former dental nurse said she didn't want to "make light of what had happened" but things were getting better.She said: "'I only got two hate mail (after the show). People are being all right to me." Goody and her agent were returning from visiting a monument in New Delhi and remarked there had been a "good response" from the Indian public to her presence.At the height of the row, the Indian tourist board in London issued an open invitation to her to come to the country to find out for herself about the culture and the people. Goody has been to India before - to do research on her own brand perfume called Ssssh! The bottling factory is in Gujarat - about 100 miles from Mumbai.


Take That plan UK tour

Click to enlarge photo

Take That are planning a huge UK tour of 22 shows starting later this year.The band will be playing in Birmingham, Glasgow, Newcastle, London and Manchester.Mark Owen, Gary Barlow, Howard Donald and Jason Orange have named the Beautiful World 2007 Arena tour after their number one album released last November.The band will be travelling to Las Vegas to see a series of shows to get ideas for their tour, which they want to be very hi-tech.Mark said: "We want to put on a huge production - to push it in terms of new technology - to make it really special."The tour will start on November 16 at the NEC in Birmingham and end in Manchester on December 19. Tickets go on sale on Friday.



Rowling sues Ebay 

Click to enlarge photo

Author J.K. Rowling is taking legal action against eBay after unauthorised versions of her Harry Potter books were allegedly being sold on the Indian version of the internet auction website. Rowling is suing eBay for breach of copyright and has obtained a court injunction that bans the site from listing illegal copies of her books.The writer's lawyer Akash Chittranshi says, "This is the first time eBay has been compelled to take measures to prevent e-books being sold." 



     







Mills' Dancing appearance infuriates the disabled
Sir Paul McCartney's estranged wife Heather Mills' forthcoming appearance on US TV show Dancing With The Stars has angered a disabled group in her native Britain, who claim her ability to dance means she is able-bodied. Mills wears prosthetic limb after losing her left leg below the knee following a 1993 road accident in London. After the charity campaigner confirmed she would be a contestant on the show next month, the Federation Of Disabled People claim she has no right to use the blue disabled badge on her Mercedes car, which gives users priority parking in public places and in car parks. The Federation's spokesperson Kathy Gordon says, "Clearly she has mobility so she should refrain from using the badge. It's not fair on other disable people."


Web Hosting Companies